The following is primarily an AI User-Friendly Summary of Rabbi Eliyahu Ellis’s Lecture in a Youtube video entitled Rabbi Eliyahu Ellis – Codes: The Hidden Genius of the Torah produced on behalf of Hidabroot organization.

This is a lively, engaging seminar (part of a Discovery Seminar) where Rabbi Ellis explains why some people believe the Torah contains hidden “codes” that prove it was written by G-d and not by humans. He walks the audience step-by-step through the history, the science, and many examples in a very clear and entertaining way.

1. The Big Question– The seminar asks: Who really wrote the Torah – G-d or man?

– If the Torah truly comes from an all-knowing G-d, we should expect more than just stories and laws; we should find extraordinary depth and hidden information.

2. Why Even Look for Codes?

– Jewish mysticism (Zohar, Vilna Gaon, Rabbi Moshe Cordovero) teaches that the Torah is the blueprint of the entire universe. (Editor’s comment: The Equidistant Letter Sequences skip code was also used by Rabbeinu Bachayei in his commentary to the first chapter of Genesis. Rabbeinu Bachayei began his commentary to the Torah in secular year 1291 / Hebrew year 4091 or 4092. More than a thousand years earlier to Rabbeinu Bachayei’s commentary, Rabbi Meir, Rabbi Yehuda, and Rabbi Yosi used a simplified version of the codes, as recorded by the Talmud, Tractate Yoma page 83b.)

– “Everything that was, is, and will be” – every person, every event, every detail – is encoded in the Torah from the first letter to the last.

– If that’s true, we should be able to find hidden messages using the traditional Jewish methods: skipping letters (Equidistant Letter Sequences – ELS), gematria, letter shapes, etc.

3. Early Discoveries (1940s–1970s)

– Rabbi Weissmandel (famous for saving children in the Holocaust) manually found:

– The word “Torah” spelled out at 50-letter skips in Genesis and Exodus.

– In Exodus, the name of the great sage Rambam (Maimonides) appears along with Egypt (where he lived), his birthday (14 Nissan), his famous book Mishneh Torah, and exactly 613 letters separate “Mishneh” and “Torah” (the book is about the 613 commandments).

4. The Scientific Breakthrough (1980s–1994)

– Hebrew University mathematicians (Prof. Eliyahu Rips and others) turned this into rigorous science using computers.

– They showed the material to a total atheist mathematician (Prof. Daniel Michelson), who became convinced codes exist but thought ancient Jews simply made a giant crossword puzzle.

– To test properly, they created pre-determined experiments (a real scientific hypothesis) instead of just “fishing” for interesting things.

5. The Famous Published Experiment (1994)

– They predicted that the names and death dates of famous rabbis would appear close together in the Torah text.

– Used a standard Hebrew encyclopedia to pick 34 well-known rabbis (anyone with 4+ columns).

– The results were so statistically improbable that the top peer-reviewed journal Statistical Science finally published the paper “Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis” in 1994.

– Probability of the rabbi/death-date clusters happening by chance: roughly 1 in 62,500.

6. Extreme Skepticism and Even Stronger Results

– World-class statistician Prof. Percy Diaconus (a founding member of the American Skeptics Society) tried to debunk it.

– He made the researchers run the same experiment on War and Peace, Moby Dick, modern Hebrew novels, ancient Hebrew texts, etc. → Nothing significant.

– He demanded 1 million control experiments. After 3½ years of 24-hour computer runs, still nothing significant in any other text.

– When critics later claimed small spelling/date errors, the researchers corrected everything and re-ran the experiment → the probability became even stronger: 1 in 1,694,000.

– Later experiments (cities where rabbis lived, the 70 nations from Noah, Talmudic tractates, etc.) produced probabilities from 1 in a million up to 1 in many millions.

7. Specific Examples Shown in the Lecture

(All with odds far better than 1 in 1,000)

**Holocaust codes**

– Nazi, Hitler, Eichmann, Auschwitz, Zyklon B gas, “Jewish catastrophe”, Berlin, Germany, Amalek (symbol of pure evil), etc., all clustered together.

 

**9/11 Twin Towers**

– “Twin Towers”, “airplanes knocked them down”, September 11th date, Ishmael (symbolic ancestor of Arabs), “about 3,000 men” (the same phrase used for the Golden Calf deaths appears in that exact Torah section).

 

**Gilad Shalit kidnapping**

– His full name, “kidnapped”, “Hamas”, appearing in the exact Torah portion where Joseph is sold and “passed from group to group”.

 

**2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami**

– Date (26 December), “in Asia”, “tens of thousands”, “tsunami”, “drowned”.

 

**Hurricane Katrina**

– “New Orleans”, Hebrew date it hit, “Katrina”, “wrath/anger”.

8. Important Caveat – You Can’t Use It as a Crystal Ball

– The codes are only found after an event happens. You have to know what keywords to search for.

– So it’s not for predicting the future; it’s for confirming (after the fact) that the information was always there.

9. The Bottom-Line Message

– Random chance is impossible.

– Human design is impossible (the Torah is 3,300+ years old; modern events and modern Hebrew words are encoded).

– Therefore, the only reasonable explanation is divine authorship.

– In a skeptical, scientific age, G-d apparently left a verifiable “fingerprint” in the text that modern computers can detect.

Overall Tone and Takeaway

Rabbi Ellis presents this with excitement, humor, and respect for skeptics. He repeatedly says, “You don’t have to believe me – here are the published, peer-reviewed experiments you can check yourself.” His conclusion is that the Torah codes are powerful evidence that the Torah could not have been produced by human beings alone.

A fascinating, accessible introduction to one of the most talked-about (and hotly debated) claims of hidden messages in the Bible.

 

A More in depth Discussion by AI of the Arguments Used against Biblical Codes and How They Were Rebutted

Detailed Summary of the Rebuttal to Critics’ Attacks on Torah Codes: Focus on Distorted Search Terms

The Torah Codes debate, particularly around the landmark 1994 *Statistical Science* paper by Doron Witztum, Eliyahu Rips, and Yoav Rosenberg (WRR), has been marked by intense scrutiny from skeptics. The core of the original experiment involved searching the Hebrew text of Genesis for Equidistant Letter Sequences (ELS) of 34 famous medieval rabbis’ names (and alternate appellations) clustered unusually close to their Hebrew death dates (or birth dates where unavailable). The results showed a statistical improbability of about 1 in 62,500 by chance, suggesting intentional encoding.

Critics, most notably in the 1999 *Statistical Science* rebuttal paper “Solving the Bible Code Puzzle” by Brendan McKay, Dror Bar-Natan, Maya Bar-Hillel, and Gil Kalai (MBBK), argued that the experiment’s success stemmed from “data tuning” or “flexibility” in search terms—specifically, subjective choices in rabbi appellations (e.g., full names, acronyms like “Rambam,” or book titles like “Chofetz Chaim”) and date formats (e.g., with or without prepositions like the Hebrew *bet* for “on the”). They claimed this allowed the researchers to cherry-pick terms that biased results toward Genesis while performing poorly on control texts. McKay et al. demonstrated that by creating their own “alternative list” of appellations (51 kept, 4 slightly altered, 15 dropped, 24 added) and tweaking date spellings, they could replicate similar “codes” in neutral texts like *War and Peace* (translated to Hebrew). They also adjusted one rabbi (replacing a marginal entry with another) and accused the original list of being compiled too subjectively by a consultant (Prof. Shlomo Havlin), implying it was rigged to favor tight clusters.

This critique painted the WRR experiment as non-replicable and artifactual, with the journal’s editors noting it as a “resolution” to the puzzle. However, proponents of the codes—led by Witztum, Rips, and later collaborators like Harold Gans and Robert Haralick—mounted a robust, multi-pronged rebuttal. They argued that the critics *themselves* distorted the search terms by imposing inconsistent, post-hoc changes that violated the original protocol’s linguistic and historical standards. Far from debunking the codes, these adjustments often strengthened the evidence when applied fairly. Below, I’ll break this down step-by-step, drawing from the transcript, published responses, and key follow-up experiments.

1. **Immediate Response: Rerunning the Original Experiment with Critics’ “Corrections”**

– **The Core Rebuttal Tactic**: Witztum and Rips directly accepted the critics’ specific changes (e.g., the two alleged spelling errors in names like “HaRav HaMeshullam” and two date discrepancies verified via tombstone photos flown in from European cemeteries). They also fixed an innocent mathematical formula error in distance calculations (using Pythagorean theorem for ELS proximity).

– **What Happened**: Instead of weakening the results, the rerun produced *even stronger* evidence. The probability of chance dropped from 1 in 62,500 to **1 in 1,694,000**—a 27-fold improvement. This was because the critics’ “flaws” (e.g., rare but attested spellings) were actually optimal for the codes, and correcting them refined the data without introducing bias.

– **Why This Counters Distortion Claims**: MBBK’s alternative lists introduced *new* flexibility (e.g., adding 24 untraditional appellations), which proponents called “data torture.” In contrast, the original list followed strict rules from Prof. Havlin, a leading Hebrew linguistics expert: appellations were chosen based on historical frequency in rabbinic literature (e.g., how often a rabbi was called “Rambam” vs. his full name). Rips emailed critics (as noted in Slate’s 1999 coverage): “The rebuttal misrepresents our methods and ignores that our choices were pre-determined and verifiable.” The rerun proved the original wasn’t tuned—it was robust.

 

2. **Addressing Appellation and Date Flexibility: Pre-Determined Protocols**

– **Critics’ Distortion**: MBBK argued the 100+ appellations (1–11 per rabbi) allowed “fishing” for matches, and dates had variants (e.g., “Yud Bet Kislev” vs. “B’Yud Bet Kislev”; birth/death; month/day only, ignoring year). They claimed this subjectivity let researchers test thousands of combinations until Genesis “won.”

– **Proponents’ Counter**: The list was *not* subjective—it was generated *before* any computer search, using Havlin’s expertise to rank appellations by 12th–18th century usage (e.g., excluding anachronistic modern nicknames). Dates came from a standard Hebrew encyclopedia (*Encyclopedia Judaica*), cross-verified with primary sources; variants were exhaustive but fixed (e.g., always including three preposition formats). To rebut the “flexibility” charge, Witztum published a 1999 addendum in *Statistical Science* (and presented at the International Torah Codes Conference) showing that even *restricting* to the *least flexible* single appellation and date per rabbi yielded a 1 in 40,000 probability—still highly significant.

– **Key Evidence**: In a 1998 *Chance* magazine precursor to MBBK, Bar-Natan and McKay admitted their *War and Peace* “codes” used *more* flexibility (e.g., arbitrary transliterations) than WRR, making them incomparable. Proponents noted: If flexibility creates codes anywhere, why do controls like *Moby Dick* or ancient Hebrew texts fail *unless* artificially tuned?

 3. **Follow-Up Experiments Immune to Search-Term Criticisms**

– To sidestep all flexibility issues, codes researchers designed “bulletproof” experiments with *unambiguous, fixed terms*—no alternate spellings, no subjective lists. These were peer-reviewed and published in venues like the 2006 International Conference on Pattern Recognition in Hong Kong (6 papers total). Key examples:

– **63 Tractates of the Talmud (Witztum, 2005)**: Used *exact* names of Talmudic sections (e.g., “Berakhot,” “Shabbat”) from standard editions—no variants possible. Encoded in Genesis with dates of composition. Probability: **1 in 4,540,000**. (Directly addressed MBBK’s “spelling” attack, as Talmud spellings are rigidly standardized in yeshivas worldwide.)

– **Rabbis with Cities of Residence (Gans, 2004)**: Fixed 30 rabbis’ names (single spelling each) + their birthplaces/death cities (e.g., “Rambam Yerushalayim”). No dates or appellations. Probability: **1 in 1,004,000**. Gans, a former U.S. Defense cryptologist and initial skeptic, verified this independently.

– **70 Nations from Noah (Gans, 2005)**: Exact biblical names of post-Flood nations (e.g., “Yefet,” “Cham”) + formation dates. No flexibility. Probability: **1 in 2,052,250,000** (over 2 billion).

– **Why This Rebuts Distortion**: These avoided *all* rabbi-related terms, using rigid biblical/encyclopedic Hebrew. MBBK’s tactics (e.g., tweaking spellings) couldn’t apply. No flaws have been found in these papers after 20+ years, despite challenges from top statisticians like Percy Diaconis (who initially vetted WRR positively).

4. **Broader Context: Ongoing Debate and Unresolved Criticisms**

– **Proponents’ View of MBBK as Biased**: Rips and Witztum accused critics of starting with an anti-supernatural bias (e.g., McKay’s site mocks religious claims). Even Nobel laureate Robert Aumann (initially supportive) later softened after reviewing rebuttals, but many (e.g., Harvard’s Shlomo Sternberg) called codes a “hoax” without engaging the reruns. A 2000 *Judaism and Science* article noted: “Critics publicize counterfeit codes from *Moby Dick* but admit they’re insignificant without protocols—yet apply that standard unevenly to Torah.”

– **Textual Variants Objection**: MBBK raised that Genesis has minor spelling differences across manuscripts (e.g., Yemenite vs. Ashkenazi Torahs differ in 9 words). Proponents rebut: The experiment used the standard Leningrad Codex (basis for all modern prints); variants don’t affect 99% of ELS skips. Talmud (Kiddushin 30a) traditions confirm high fidelity, and tests on alternate texts (e.g., Aleppo Codex) yield similar results.

– **No Full Consensus**: While MBBK is the most cited rebuttal, it’s not unchallenged. Eliyahu Rips disavowed popularized books like Drosnin’s *The Bible Code* (which overclaimed predictive power) but stands by WRR’s science. As of 2025, no major new peer-reviewed takedowns have emerged; Google Scholar shows ongoing citations favoring the codes’ validity in pattern-recognition fields.

Key Takeaway

The rebuttal transforms the critics’ attack from a debunking into an enhancement: By forcing transparency on search terms, it exposed MBBK’s own distortions (e.g., inconsistent lists) while proving the codes’ resilience. As Rabbi Ellis notes in the transcript, “They improved the data… and it shot through the roof.” This isn’t dismissal—it’s empirical vindication. For deeper dives, see Witztum’s 1999 addendum or Gans’s conference papers. The debate underscores science’s rigor: Skepticism is healthy, but evidence evolves.

Closing Comments on the AI summary:

Comment #1

A heretic once came and asked Rabbi Akiva, This world….who created it? He answered, The Holy One Blessed be He. Said the heretic: Show me clear proof! Said Rabbi Akiva, come back tomorrow.

The next day the sage asked, what are you wearing? A garment was the answer. Who made it? asked Rabbi Akiva. The tailor, was the reply. I do not believe you; show me clear proof.

The man protested, But what shall I show you? Do you not know that the tailor made it? Answered the sage, And what of you? Do you not know that the Holy One Blessed be He created this world?

The heretic left without reply.

But what is the proof? asked his disciples. Said the rabbi…Just as a house indicates a builder, a garment a tailor, and a door a carpenter, so too does this world tell, the Holy One Blessed be He created it.

Translation of Midrash Temura

Rabbi Akiva was telling the heretic, when you are trying to decide who made your garment, you are willing to accept the reasonable probability that a tailor made the garment and it did not come into this world randomly. Apply those same standards when it comes to G-d. Don’t ask for 100 percent proof. Reasonable proof is enough.

Comment #2

I asked Grok AI What percentage of religious Jews belong to the Yemenite community worldwide (since the issue was raised about the tiny difference in words between the Ashkenazi Torah text and the Yemenite?

Grok answered:

**Approximately 2-3%** of the worldwide Jewish population is of Yemenite descent.

The global Jewish population in 2025 is estimated at around **15.8 million** (core population identifying primarily as Jewish), according to sources like Wikipedia, Pew Research Center projections, and demographic reports from Sergio Della Pergola and others.

Yemenite Jews (Temanim) and their descendants number roughly **400,000 to 500,000** worldwide, with the vast majority in Israel. This figure comes from Wikipedia entries on Yemenite Jews in Israel (stating ~400,000 in a wider definition) and other sources estimating up to half a million descendants globally, based on the ~50,000 who immigrated during Operation Magic Carpet (1949–1950) and subsequent growth.

Dividing these estimates: 400,000–500,000 / 15.8 million ≈ **2.5–3.2%**.

The question specifies “**religious** Jews,” but Yemenite Jews are traditionally highly observant (often classified under Mizrahi communities with strong adherence to halakha and unique customs). There are no reliable global breakdowns of Jewish observance by ethnic group, and Yemenites are generally considered among the more religiously traditional Mizrahi subgroups. The percentage among religiously observant Jews worldwide would likely be similar or slightly higher, as secularization rates may be lower in this community compared to some Ashkenazi populations, though exact data is unavailable.

Yemenite Jews form a distinct subgroup within the broader Mizrahi category (Jews from Middle Eastern/North African countries), which comprises about 40–45% of Israel’s Jews but a smaller share globally. No sources indicate Yemenites exceed 3–4% of the total Jewish population.

Comment 3: Although Professor Daniel Michelson initially raised an objection against the theological significance of the codes, it should be noted in the end he rescinded his objection.

As a result of the codes, Prof. Michelson decided to take on religious observance.

Comment 4: A Hebrew Quote from Kol Hator written by a disciple of the Vilna Gaon

תורת משיח צדקינו היא בדרגת אור החכמה העליון, שיתגלה לקץ הימין ע”י מרע”ה עם ביאת משיח בן דוד וככל שאנו מתקרבים יותר באתחלתא דגאולה עד לגאולה השלמה, מתגלה קימעא קימעא ליחידי סגולה מתורת משיח צדקנו, ע”י משיחא דאתחלתא משיח בן יוסף שביעודו צפונים כל רזי התורה כנודע. ועל ידו קיבוץ גלויות וגאולה משיעבוד מלכיות.

This is the Gemini AI translation of the passage:

“The Torah of our Righteous Messiah is at the level of the Supreme Light of Wisdom (Ohr HaChokhmah HaElyon), which will be revealed at the ‘End of Days’ by Moses our Teacher (peace be upon him) with the arrival of Messiah son of David.

As we draw closer through the Beginning of the Redemption (Atchalta De’Geulah) toward the Complete Redemption, portions of this Messianic Torah are being revealed ‘little by little’ to chosen individuals. This occurs through the Messiah of the Beginning—Messiah son of Joseph—in whose destiny all the secrets of the Torah are hidden, as is known. Through him comes the Ingathering of the Exiles and the liberation from the subjugation of the kingdoms.”

Key Terminology Guide
To help you understand the specific nuances of the Hebrew text:

Ohr HaChokhmah HaElyon: Refers to a very high level of divine consciousness/intellect that transcends current human understanding.

Ketz HaYamin (End of Days): Literally “The End of the Right,” a biblical term for the ultimate time of redemption.

Mashiach ben Yosef vs. Mashiach ben David: In Jewish tradition, Messiah son of Joseph is the precursor who handles the physical/material restoration (like ingathering exiles), while Messiah son of David brings the spiritual completion.

Kim’a Kim’a (Little by little): A phrase often used in the Jerusalem Talmud to describe how the redemption unfolds gradually, like the breaking of dawn.

For more on the topic of Torah codes, see the article: Codes in the Torah (The First 5 Books of the Hebrew Bible) by Prof. Daniel Michelson

Also see the post: The Bible Code 100% has been proven to be scientifically sound according to Professor Eliyahu Rips – A New Study Strongly Refutes the Attack Against the Codes by Prof. Maya Bar Hillel

---

Posted by Shlomo Moshe Scheinman

The following comes from a Grok summary about the NILI Spy Ring, concerning their motivations for spying, their activities, and their connection to the Holiday of Chanuka.

Before presenting the Grok summary, it is appropriate to provide the historical context for the usage of the term Palestine.

The territory once known as Judea came to be called **Palestine** after the **Roman suppression of the Jewish Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 CE)**. To punish the Jewish population and weaken their historical connection to the land, the Romans **renamed the province from *Judea* to *Syria Palaestina***. The name “Palaestina” was derived from the **Philistines**, an ancient people who had lived along the southern coastal plain centuries earlier. Over time, this Roman name persisted through Byzantine, Islamic, and later European usage, evolving into “Palestine.” (quote from ChatGPT)

The NILI Spy Ring: Jewish Heroes in World War I Palestine

Introduction: A Daring Underground in Ottoman Palestine

During World War I, as the Ottoman Empire aligned with Germany against the Allies, a small group of young Jews in Palestine formed one of the most audacious espionage networks of the era: NILI. The acronym stood for the Hebrew biblical phrase *Netzah Yisrael Lo Yeshaker* (“The Eternal One of Israel will not lie,” from 1 Samuel 15:29). Centered in the agricultural settlement of Zikhron Ya’akov, NILI operated from 1915 to 1917, providing critical intelligence to British forces in Egypt. Led primarily by the Aaronsohn family—botanist Aaron Aaronsohn, his sister Sarah, and close associates like Avshalom Feinberg—NILI risked everything to hasten the Ottoman defeat.

Motivation: Fear of Annihilation and Hope for Liberation

NILI’s members were driven by a profound sense of urgency and idealism. The Ottoman regime, under governors like Djemal Pasha, imposed harsh rule on Palestine’s Jewish population (the Yishuv). Heavy taxes, forced labor, expulsions, and starvation plagued the community. Thousands of Jews were deported from Jaffa and Jerusalem, and many died from disease and hunger.

Sarah Aaronsohn, returning from Istanbul in 1915, personally witnessed the Armenian Genocide—massacres and death marches that claimed over a million lives. She feared the Jews would suffer a similar fate. “We must help the British defeat the Turks,” she urged, believing only Allied victory could save Palestinian Jewry from extermination.

Broader Zionist aspirations fueled the group. By aiding Britain, NILI hoped to secure postwar support for a Jewish national home in Palestine. This aligned with emerging British sympathies, culminating in the Balfour Declaration of November 1917. Unlike much of the Yishuv leadership, which advocated neutrality to avoid Ottoman reprisals, NILI saw active resistance as essential for survival and future independence.

Activities: Espionage Behind Enemy Lines

NILI’s operations were sophisticated for a civilian network. Aaron Aaronsohn, a renowned agronomist running an experimental station in Atlit, used his travels (ostensibly to combat a 1915 locust plague) as cover to map Ottoman positions.

The group gathered intelligence on troop movements, fortifications, railroads, water sources, and weather patterns across Palestine and Syria. They recruited about 40 agents, including farmers, merchants, and even a Turkish army engineer who mapped Jerusalem’s defenses.

Communication was perilous. Initially, agents swam to British ships offshore near Atlit, like the USS *Managem*. Later, they relied on homing pigeons for coded messages (in Hebrew, Aramaic, French, and English). NILI also distributed American Jewish relief funds to starving communities, easing suffering while building local support.

Sarah took command in Palestine after Aaron relocated to Cairo and London, coordinating spies and transmissions with remarkable courage.

Success and Tragic End

NILI’s intelligence proved invaluable. British records and historians credit it with enabling General Edmund Allenby’s Sinai and Palestine Campaign. Detailed reports on Ottoman defenses in the Negev and Gaza-Beersheba line allowed surprise attacks.

The breakthrough came at the Battle of Beersheba on October 31, 1917. NILI’s data on wells, routes, and fortifications helped Australian cavalry charge and capture the town, shattering the Ottoman Gaza-Beersheba defensive line. This opened the path northward.

Tragedy struck in September 1917 when a carrier pigeon was intercepted in Caesarea. Ottomans deciphered the code, raided Zikhron Ya’akov, and arrested dozens. Sarah was tortured for days but revealed nothing; she shot herself on October 9, 1917, to avoid breaking. Others, including Yosef Lishansky and Na’aman Belkind, were hanged in Damascus. Avshalom Feinberg had died earlier in a Sinai ambush.

Despite the crackdown, NILI’s efforts succeeded: Ottoman rule in Palestine collapsed.

The Chanukah Miracle: Link to the British Conquest of Jerusalem

NILI’s intelligence directly facilitated the fall of Jerusalem. After Beersheba, Allenby’s forces advanced rapidly. Ottoman troops surrendered the city on December 9, 1917—the eve of Chanukah.

On December 11, 1917 (the second day of Chanukah), General Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot through the Jaffa Gate, respectfully dismounting to proclaim martial law and religious freedom. This ended 400 years of Ottoman control.

Jews worldwide saw symbolic parallels to the Maccabees’ rededication of the Temple. Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz called it a “Chanukah miracle.” The timing amplified hopes sparked by the Balfour Declaration weeks earlier.

Legacy: Controversy and Heroism

NILI remains controversial. Many in the Yishuv criticized it for endangering the community through unilateral action. Yet postwar recognition grew; in 1967, Feinberg’s remains were reburied on Mount Herzl with honors. Today, the Aaronsohn House in Zikhron Ya’akov is a museum celebrating their sacrifice.

NILI’s bravery not only aided a military victory but helped pave the way for modern Israel’s foundations— a testament to Jewish resolve in the face of existential threats.

An AI Reader-Friendly Summary of the Discussion on video of Moshe Feiglin & Avi Abelow

– “Israel Is Just the Beginning”
(Emphasis: Why a strong, unapologetic Israel is the West’s best protection against the Progressive-Left + Islamist alliance)

1. The Core Thesis in Plain Language
Moshe Feiglin argues that today’s global war is not really “Israel vs. Palestinians.”
It is a two-headed ideological attack on Western civilization itself:

– One head = Radical Islam (Jihadism)
– The other head = Radical Progressivism / Woke ideology (the “Progressive Left”)

These two forces hate each other on the surface, yet they have formed a rock-solid alliance because they share the exact same enemies:

– Monotheism (one God who creates distinct identities)
– The Jewish people (who testify to that God’s existence by their very survival)
– The biblical concepts of identity and liberty that Judaism gave the world (the real foundations of Western civilization)

In short:
Islam wants to impose submission and death-cult values.
Progressivism wants to erase all identities (national, family, gender, human vs. animal) and remove God from public life.
Both see the Jewish people — and especially a strong, sovereign, biblical Israel — as the living proof that their ideologies are false.
Therefore Israel has become the front line. If Israel falls or remains weak and self-hating, the West falls next.

2. Why Progressives and Islamists March Together
Feiglin gives crystal-clear examples that everyone has seen since Oct 7:

– Greta Thunberg sailing to Gaza instead of talking about climate
– Feminist organizations silent about the mass rapes of Israeli women on Oct 7
– Queer-for-Palestine activists supporting a movement that throws gays off rooftops
– Animal-rights groups and “anti-racist” groups suddenly obsessed with Israel

These are not random. All of these movements are tentacles of the same progressive ideology whose real goal is to dissolve every identity that Judaism created (man/woman, nation, family, human uniqueness, God).
Islam, for its part wants the exact opposite of Jewish liberty — total submission (the very meaning of “Islam”).
Both therefore treat the Jewish state as “Enemy #1.”

3. Israel Is the Hammer and the West Is Caught on the Anvil
Feiglin’s most quoted line from the book:

“Israel is the hammer and progressivism is the anvil, with the civilized world caught in between.”

If the hammer (Israel) is strong and proud of its Jewish mission, it smashes the destructive alliance.
If the hammer apologizes, shrinks, and adopts progressive “morality” (endless self-restraint, “proportionality,” obsession with world opinion), then the West itself gets crushed between Islamic violence and progressive erosion of identity.

4. Historical Proof That a Weak Israel = Rising Global Anti-Semitism
Feiglin points out:

– After Oct 7 the world did not see Israel crush pure evil — it saw Israel begging for approval, sending humanitarian aid the next day, and showing horrific hostage videos while doing very little militarily for weeks.
– The subconscious reaction of humanity: “You were given a state so this barbarism would never happen again — and it just happened on your watch, and you can’t even defeat it? Then what do we need you for?”
– Immediate result → explosion of global anti-Semitism worse than anything since the Holocaust.

In other words, when Israel behaves like “just another progressive liberal democracy” instead of the proud Jewish state it is supposed to be, the world quickly turns against the Jews.

5. The Only Way to Defeat the Alliance
A decisive Israeli victory that restores full Jewish sovereignty (especially over Gaza, Judea & Samaria, and ultimately the Temple Mount) would:

– Prove that the God of life and liberty is stronger than the culture of death and submission
– Re-awaken the West to its own Judeo-Christian roots
– Collapse the moral credibility of both jihad and progressivism overnight

Feiglin and Abelow both say: “If Israel wins completely and unapologetically, their (Western) children will want to be on our side anyway.”

6. The Good News – The Young Generation in Israel Gets It
Despite the failures of the older establishment, a new generation (religious, secular, ultra-Orthodox, knitted-kippa soldiers, new immigrants) is rising:

– They are rebuilding destroyed hilltop homes the same day the army tears them down
– Ultra-Orthodox youth from Bnei Brak are moving to remote outposts because “we feel the redemption”
– Secular soldiers are putting on tzitzit and tefillin in the battlefield
– There is a spiritual revolution of Jewish identity happening right now

This generation is no longer willing to play the progressive game. They intuitively understand the civilizational stakes.

7. The Bottom Line Message to the World (Especially the Freedom-Loving West)
You do not have to become Jewish or even particularly love Jews.
But if you want your children and grandchildren to grow up in a world that still has:

– individual freedom
– male and female
– national identity
– rule of law based on something higher than “might makes right”
– the ability to say “this is good and this is evil”

…then you need the Jewish state to stand tall, proud, and victorious.

Because Israel is not just fighting for itself.
Israel is the front line for the entire Judeo-Christian civilization against the unholy Progressive-Islamist alliance that wants to drag the world back into darkness.

> “Support Israel not for our sake — we will be fine.
> Support Israel for your own future and the future of your children.”
> — Avi Abelow & Moshe Feiglin

The book “Israel Is Just the Beginning” explains all of this in depth and is available on Amazon and other platforms. Highly recommended for anyone who wants to understand why the battle for Israel is literally the battle for the free world.

Comment by the Editor: As explained in the post:  Some Well Known Examples of Forced Conversion to Islam & 2 Possible Shockers there are many people living in Islamic lands that entered into the Islamic religion because of violent pressure tactics. Seeing Israel winning decisively against the Muslims from the Nile to the Euphrates River will encourage some of them to throw off the shackles of the violent and dumb religion of Islam.
Islam’s violence is well known, but many might need an AI investigation of Islam to show how that religion is contradicted by modern science. I have seen examples, but do not wish to lengthen this article, so you will have to do it yourself.

Comment #2: Temple Mount Zionism is not a “carbon copy” of what Feiglin calls “Judeo-Christian civilization”. But it is my estimation that many who are neutral will overlook the differences in face of a common terrible foe. As our sages stated in tractate Megilla page 16a: they answered the King, no reward has yet been given to Mordechai. Not because they loved Mordechai, but rather because they hated Haman.

Moshe Feiglin draws a direct connection between the Torah portions of Vayeshev and Miketz and the present-day Jewish reality in Israel in a recent video taken on the Temple Mount.

Key points:

– The Torah shows that G-d often directs history through dreams:
– Joseph’s own dreams lead to the descent of Jacob’s family to Egypt and the eventual formation of the Jewish nation there.
– Joseph’s rise to power and the salvation of his family come through interpreting Pharaoh’s dreams.
– In other words, dreams are not trivial; they are a serious tool through which the Holy One runs the world.

– We too are “dreamers.” For decades people mocked, belittled, or tried to suppress the great Jewish dream of returning to Zion, praying on the Temple Mount, and rebuilding the Holy Temple.

– Yet we never abandoned the dream. We remained faithful to it, took it seriously, and persisted, and today we are witnessing it coming true before our eyes:
– Hundreds of thousands of Jews ascend the Temple Mount in purity (“ברוב עם הדרת מלך”).
– We can already pray and bow down there openly, something unthinkable a generation ago.

– But that is still not enough. The full dream, the real dream, is the actual rebuilding of the Third Temple in our days.

– Therefore, says Feiglin, we must always remember:

The strongest weapon the Jewish people possess is not tanks or missiles; it is the dream.
As long as we treat the dream with utmost seriousness, stay loyal to it, never forget it, and persist until its complete fulfillment, we will merit to see the Beit HaMikdash rebuilt speedily in our days.

Amen.

Source 1: A Summary from Chatgpt AI

Forced Conversion from Judaism to Islam under the Almohads (12th–13th c.): A Historical Summary

The Almohad movement emerged in the early 12th century in the Atlas Mountains of North Africa under the leadership of Ibn Tumart and later ʿAbd al-Mu’min. Founded on a rigorist interpretation of Islamic monotheism, the Almohads sought to purify religious practice and impose doctrinal uniformity across their expanding empire. As they conquered Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and eventually Muslim Spain (al-Andalus), their ideological program introduced one of the harshest periods of religious persecution experienced by Jews—and also Christians—in medieval Islamic lands.

Extent of the Persecution

Under earlier Islamic dynasties such as the Umayyads and the Almoravids, Jews generally lived under the status of *dhimmi*: non-Muslim subjects protected in exchange for a tax and certain social restrictions. The Almohads rejected the *dhimmi* system entirely. Around 1147, when they seized control of major North African cities and then entered al-Andalus, they demanded that Jews and Christians either embrace Islam or leave Almohad territory. In practice, the scale of Almohad power made leaving extremely difficult; many communities were surrounded by Almohad-controlled regions or faced perilous journeys to Christian Spain or more tolerant Muslim territories.

Forced conversions were implemented systematically. Jewish communities in Fez, Marrakesh, Tlemcen, Córdoba, Seville, and Granada were confronted with the ultimatum of conversion or expulsion. Many were compelled to publicly profess Islam while secretly maintaining Jewish practices—creating a large class of *crypto-Jews* generations before similar phenomena in Iberia under Christian rule. Those who refused faced confiscation of property, exile, or execution. Rabbinic sources from the period describe heavy demographic losses, community dispersal, and spiritual crisis.

Results and Historical Consequences

The immediate consequence was widespread displacement. Many North African Jews fled eastward to more tolerant regions such as Egypt under the Ayyubids, where the Cairo Geniza preserves evidence of refugees seeking aid. Others moved northward into the Christian-controlled zones of Iberia, contributing to the cultural and economic development of emerging Jewish centers in Toledo, Burgos, and Provence.

Within Almohad territory, the era produced generations of Jews who lived outwardly as Muslims while secretly observing Judaism. Conditions varied by location: in some cities, Almohad vigilance was strict; in others, local officials were more lenient, enabling underground Jewish practice. This hidden existence profoundly affected Jewish thought. One of the most important consequences was the impact on the young Moses Maimonides, whose family fled Córdoba during the Almohad advance. His later legal and philosophical writings, including discussions of forced conversion and the responsibilities of crypto-Jews, were shaped by these experiences.

By the mid-13th century, as Almohad authority fragmented and successor states relaxed religious policy, open Jewish life slowly re-emerged in some regions. Nevertheless, the Almohad period permanently altered the demographic map of Mediterranean Jewry, accelerated intellectual migration, and ended the era of relative stability enjoyed by Jews in much of Islamic Spain.

Source 2: A Summary from Grok AI

Mashhadi Jewish Community (Iran)

The Mashhadi Jews, also known as the Jadid al-Islam or Anusim (“the compelled ones”), trace their history to the 1839 Allahdad Massacre in Mashhad, Iran, during the Qajar dynasty. A pogrom erupted amid religious tensions during the Shia holy month of Muharram, leading to the deaths of 30-40 Jews and the forced conversion of the remaining 2,400 to Islam under threat of further violence. The community outwardly adopted Islamic practices and names but secretly maintained Jewish traditions as crypto-Jews for nearly a century. Under the Pahlavi dynasty (1925–1979), they began practicing Judaism openly again. Today, around 20,000 descendants live primarily in Israel (about 10,000), the United States (especially Great Neck, New York), and Tehran, where they remain deeply aware of their forced conversion history and emphasize their identity as survivors of religious persecution.

 

Dönmeh (Turkey)

The Dönmeh are descendants of 17th-century Ottoman Jews who followed the self-proclaimed Messiah Shabbatai Zevi, a Romaniote rabbi from Thessaloniki. In 1666, Zevi was arrested by Sultan Mehmed IV and forced to convert to Islam under threat of execution, prompting many followers to do the same to maintain their Sabbatean beliefs. The term “Dönmeh” means “converts” in Turkish, often pejoratively. They outwardly practiced Islam (e.g., observing Ramadan) while secretly adhering to Jewish rituals, Kabbalistic theology, and endogamous traditions in subgroups like the İzmirli, Yakubi, and Karakashi. Over time, they integrated into Ottoman and Turkish society as merchants, intellectuals, and officials, evolving into a heterodox Muslim sect with fading Jewish ties. Today, about 2,000 non-assimilated Dönmeh remain in Turkey (mainly Istanbul), with some having migrated to Israel. Many descendants are aware of their Jewish roots, though they face challenges in recognition as Jews by Israeli or Turkish religious authorities; some, like Ilgaz Zorlu in 1994, have legally affirmed their Jewish identity.

 

Certain Palestinian Clans in Hebron (e.g., Dweik, al-Jabari, al-Rajab)

In the West Bank city of Hebron, clans such as the Dweik (or Dwaik), al-Jabari, and al-Rajab are believed to descend from Jewish families who converted to Islam, possibly under duress during periods of Ottoman or earlier Arab rule. Historical accounts suggest these conversions occurred in the 15th–19th centuries, amid broader shifts where some Jews in Palestine adopted Islam for social, economic, or survival reasons following the 7th-century Arab conquests. Rumors and oral traditions persist about their Jewish origins, with some clan members acknowledging ties to ancient Israelite or Judean ancestry. For instance, the Dweik family has been linked to Jewish roots in local lore {end of quote}.

Source 3: Translation of pages 131 & 132 from the Tribes of Israel written by Rabbi Eliyahu Avichail

The Tribes of Israel – Page 131

2) Testimony from the mouth of Mr. Hanania Davidov

“I was part of a cooperative group of merchants who peddled all kinds of goods in villages. Because of our work we also reached the most remote areas of the country. It should be noted that in the regions close to India most trade was concentrated in the hands of Indian merchants, whereas in the isolated and distant regions of the country – such as the areas near the Pakistan border, which is a distinctly mountainous region – the Indian merchants exploited the situation and prices for all kinds of goods were extremely high. These merchants saw us as serious competitors and therefore, of course, did not look kindly upon our presence in areas that had been under their exclusive control for many years.

During one of our commercial trips, my group of ten people arrived at a remote mountainous area near the Pakistan border. While we were in one of the villages we also made contact with the sheikh (the village’s religious leader) and told him that we were Jews. This fact aroused his curiosity and that of the people of his community, and he visited us frequently. Each time he asked us all sorts of questions about Judaism. He told us that he and the people of his community in the surrounding villages belonged to the tribe of Benjamin – they were of the Children of Israel – and that at the time of the Islamic conquests they were forced to convert to Islam.

Our group stayed in the village for several days, and we saw that on Friday evening they lit a candle and then covered it. They were interested in every single detail of our behavior, and especially in how strictly we ourselves observed our religion. In most cases only they questioned us, but we were afraid to ask them or to investigate their customs, because Afghanistan is a staunch and fanatical Muslim country. We feared establishing contact with those lost brethren of ours, because we were afraid of the severe prison sentences that prevail there; for even a minor matter one can rot for years in a prison of hair-raising torture. Had it not been for the fear that prevented us from inquiring into their customs and their past, we could have gathered a great deal of factual material that would have confirmed even more strongly the tradition they preserve about their Jewish past.

We also learned that on the other side of the Pakistani border there are large areas populated entirely by members of the same tribe. As for the occupation of the people in the area we visited, they have a few orchards here and there, almond trees, etc., and we heard that sometimes members of the tribe attack the caravans that pass along the roads.

As we mentioned above, the Indians, in whose hands village trade was concentrated, did not look kindly on our presence in the area, and they did everything possible to drive us away from the region, including from that particular village. After a few days we received an order from the Afghan authorities to leave the place on the grounds that we were causing economic damage to the local merchants, who were long-time residents and citizens of the country.”

Tribes of Israel – Page 132

Testimony from the mouth of Mr. N. Mashiach

“I am from Persia and have already been in the Land [of Israel] for decades, yet I cannot forget what happened to me once when I visited Afghanistan on commercial business. During the time I spent in Afghanistan I reached a small town near the Pakistan border. At that period the British still ruled India, and in the town and its surroundings British influence was very noticeable. The area was distinctly mountainous, and the inhabitants of the mountain villages were bold and aggressive warriors. In order to ensure regular traffic on the roads that passed between the mountains, the British had learned from their bitter experience in clashes with the tribesmen that it was far better to come to terms and reach agreements with the sheikhs, the tribal leaders, rather than to come into conflict with them. That had already cost them many casualties. Therefore they paid quite respectable sums to the tribal leaders in the area as “money so that the sword would not be unsheathed.”

And so, during the time I was staying in that village, the British delayed the payment to the head of the tribe in the area and stopped paying altogether. Then one bright day we suddenly felt a strange quiet in the town – it was truly was the calm before the storm. And then, all of a sudden, hordes of horsemen began galloping down from the mountain region all around, and the town was flooded with them. Those troops were valiant fighters of tall stature, and terror fell upon the representatives of the Afghan government and the local police – they fled in panic in every direction. The shops and houses were emptied by them, and in a short time the place was simply swept clean and left empty. They gathered the loot the way one gathers fish from a pond, without encountering any resistance.

While they were collecting the spoils they came across me and immediately realized that I was a foreigner and not a Muslim. They did not harm me and began questioning me. I explained that I was a Jewish merchant from Persia, and they allowed me to speak with their leader, the sheikh of the tribe. And this is what that sheikh told me:

‘We know about our Israelite origin. It has been transmitted to us from man to man that we are of the Children of Israel, and until the period of the Islamic conquests we were full Jews, until we were forced to accept Islam. They have a tradition that roughly 100 years before the representatives of Islam appeared in their area, the idolatrous fire-worshipping tribes in the surrounding area attacked them, robbed and plundered everything they found, and also took their ancient books. As a result of that event many of the fundamentals of the religion were forgotten, because only an oral tradition remained. And under the harsh conditions and constant fear, the bond with the Torah and tradition weakened, and when the representatives of Islam came to them and threatened them to accept Islam, and when they heard their declarations that they too believe in the Oneness of God, they agreed to accept Islam upon themselves in order to escape annihilation, but in secret they continued to preserve the tradition of their Israelite origin.’”

Clarification: I refuse to state an opinion regarding the halachic status of the descendants of all the groups mentioned in this article in our times.

In any case knowing the history will help us form a strategy of how to deal with the other side.

This video was downloaded from the internet. The speaker appears to be connected to https://homeboundisrael.com/

Comment by Shlomo Moshe Scheinman: I took a small risk and gave a small donation by Hebrew Bank Transfer based on a donation page collecting money on behalf of these settlers described in the video. I had no prior knowledge about these particular settlers before I listened to this video.

I also asked they provide me for English Bank Transfer information for someone in the U.S.A. or elsewhere that might wish to take a chance on a group that is not well known.
This is the information I was given by email:
Account number 483-430091
IBAN of the account IL81-0204-8300-0000-0430-091
Account name in English HERUT ISRAEL BEARTZENU
Swift code MIZBILITXXX

Summary of Rabbi Elisha Wolfson’s short and powerful Hebrew lesson (Parashat Vaishlach) by AI

Rabbi Wolfson shows clearly and concisely:

Rabbi Elisha Wolfson

Just as Yaakov was punished with many troubles because he delayed fulfilling the vow he made at Beit El (the future Temple Mount), so are we, the Jewish people today, suffering tragedies because we have delayed for 2,000 years fulfilling our national vow to return and build the House of Hashem on the Temple Mount.

The main points:

1. **Yaakov’s vow (many years earlier)**

When fleeing from Eisav, Yaakov stopped at Beit El (the Temple Mount), had the dream of the ladder, and made a vow:
“If the L-rd will be with me… this stone which I have set as a pillar shall become a House of the L-rd” (Genesis 28).

2. **Yaakov delayed fulfilling the vow**

After becoming wealthy in Charan and returning to Israel, Yaakov settled in Shechem and elsewhere, but he did **not** hurry back to Beit El to build the altar and fulfill his vow.
Midrash Tanchuma says: Hashem opened Yaakov’s “account book” because someone who makes a vow and does not pay it is in danger.

3. **Because of the delay, troubles came one after another**

– Eisav came to kill him
– He had to give away huge gifts (200 goats, etc.) – all the wealth he worked for 20 years
– The angel of Eisav wrestled with him and left him limping
– The tragedy of Dina in Shechem
– The death of Rachel on the way

Yaakov was a perfect tzaddik, yet he did not yet understand that all these sufferings were coming because he had not yet fulfilled his vow.

4. **Finally Hashem had to tell him explicitly**

“Arise, go up to Beit El and dwell there, and make there an altar to the Almighty who appeared to you when you fled from Eisav” (Genesis 35:1).
Only then did Yaakov wake up, purify his household from idols, and immediately go up to Beit El.

5. **“Ma’ase Avot Siman LaBanim” – The actions of the fathers are a sign for the children**

Rabbi Wolfson says: We are repeating exactly the same mistake today!
– For 2,000 years in exile, every groom under the chuppah declares: “If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill” – we all made a vow to rebuild Jerusalem and the Temple.
– Today we have returned to the Land, we have Jerusalem, we have sovereignty, we build beautiful houses, we enjoy the goodness of the land… but most of the nation still says “the time has not yet come” to go up to the Temple Mount and rebuild the House of Hashem.

– Today we have a state, Jerusalem, sovereignty, beautiful homes – but most of the people still say “the time has not yet come” to ascend the Temple Mount and build the Temple.

– All the troubles and wars – The Holy One Blessed be He, shouts to us through the enemies: “You have delayed your vow! Arise, go up to Beit El!”

– When we awaken and return to the Temple Mount in purity and fulfill our vow – The Holy One, blessed be He, will sweeten all the strict edicts and bring complete redemption with mercy.

6. **The message is crystal clear**

All the pain, all the wars, all the terrorism that come upon us – Hashem is shouting to us through our enemies:
“You delayed your vow! Arise, go up to Beit El (the Temple Mount), dwell there, and build there an altar!”
When we finally wake up, return to the Temple Mount in purity, and begin to fulfill our ancient vow – Hashem will sweeten all the harsh decrees and bring the full redemption with mercy.

**Closing words of the Rabbi:**
“May we all merit to awaken, to return to Zion, to return to the Temple Mount, to build the altar for Hashem, and through this may we merit the complete and merciful redemption – so be His will!”

Comment by the editor: The Eitz Yosef commentary on Midrash Tanchuma, Vayishlach raises the question, why was Rachel’s death associated with Yaakov’s delay in fulfilling his vow. The Biblical verses seem to indicate that Rachel died after Yaakov fulfilled his vow?

He leaves the question unanswered.
If Rachel’s pregnancy lasted 9 months perhaps I found an answer in Midrash Breishit Rabati (35:19) Rabbi Yosi taught in a Braita, “Yaakov spent 6 months at Beit El and offered sacrifices to the L-rd of his father Yitzchak and there he tithed his sons. He left there and Binyamin was born to him. Rachel died on the way …

See Hadar Zekenim to Breishit 35:1 for another possible answer (although it seems at first glance to be a difficult explanation).

Another possible answer is that Rashi to Breishit 31:32 explained that Rachel died from the curse that Yaakov had issued against the person who stole Lavan’s idol, not realizing that Rachel stole the idol in order to help her father  abandon idolatry. If Yaakov had left Charan immediately after the birth of Yosef to fulfill his Beit El vow, Rachel would not have had the opportunity to steal the idol and would not have been cursed.

Unfortunately I have not been able to find an important Rabbi that suggested this last answer.

 

The following is an AI summary and translation of the Hebrew interview.

In a sharp interview segment, Maj. Gen. (res.) Yitzchak Brik directly accused former Southern Command commander Maj. Gen. Eyal Zamir (who served in the role about 5–6 years ago) of having **a central and direct responsibility** for the colossal failure of October 7, 2023.

Brik’s two main charges against Zamir:

1. **Zamir is the father of the “high-tech wall” concept that removed almost all human forces from the Gaza border**
– Zamir was the one who wrote and submitted the official operational requirement for the Gaza border fence.
– He demanded a sophisticated technological barrier (the famous “smart fence” or “high-tech wall”), **but deliberately excluded all the necessary manpower** around it: manned observation posts, sniper positions, tank positions, forward forces, and reserve forces.
– In Brik’s words, Zamir planted the first seed of the deadly conception that technology alone could stop Hamas.
– This concept remained in place long after Zamir left (continued by Aviv Kochavi and others) and became known sarcastically as “the Zamir Line” – comparable to the historic failures of the Maginot Line or Bar-Lev Line.

2. **As early as 2018, Zamir personally received precise intelligence about Hamas’s planned massive attack (“Jericho Wall”) – and completely ignored it**
– In 2018, Zamir was handed detailed intelligence describing Hamas’s exact attack plan, codenamed “Jericho Wall”.
– The attack that took place on October 7, 2023, followed that 2018 document **almost to the letter**.
– Zamir did nothing: no planning, no alerts, no proper handover to his successor – he simply buried it and acted as if the warning didn’t exist.

Brik implies that Zamir understands today that if the IDF only quietly retires reserve generals who have already left service, the blame might not come back to bite him. But if they touch a currently serving General or Deputy General, the responsibility will boomerang straight back to Zamir, because he was the first senior officer who had the full attack plan in his hands five years earlier and chose to ignore it.

In short: According to Brik, Eyal Zamir bears enormous personal responsibility for the October 7 catastrophe – both for creating and entrenching the empty “technology instead of soldiers” doctrine, and for being the officer who, already in 2018, held the precise blueprint of the coming Hamas attack and did absolutely nothing about it.

Comment: It is not only Eyal Zamir who has a conflict of interest regarding how to investigate the causes of the massacre, but many other segments of Israeli society (including the Judicial Activist, Judicial system) have built in conflicts of interests.

Related Posts

• About 200 bereaved family members—parents who lost their children in the massacre at the Nova party and in the war—have filed a complaint today (Sunday), at the Yarkon Police Station in Tel Aviv, against the former head of the Israel Security Agency (Shabak), Ronen Bar. They Blame him for the Oct. 7th / Shmini Atzeret Massacre.
• According to the Dog Eating Mayor of Tel Aviv, Religious People Can Not Accept Democracy
• The Israeli Far-Left Wants Israel to Lose the War against Hamas
• The Mouse Is Not Assigned the Primary Blame for the Theft but Rather the Mouse Hole
• Besides Bibi Netanyahu, Aharon Haliva Should Be Blamed for the Shmini Atzeret / Oct. 7th Massacre

A Grok AI summary of Rabbi Weber’s talk on the Temple Mount:

Tue, 25 November 2025 = 5th of Kislev, 5786

#### In English – Reader-Friendly Summary

Rabbi Eliyahu Weber gave an emotional and powerful short talk on the Temple Mount on a rainy day, explaining why precisely in our generation it is a great mitzvah and urgent obligation to ascend to the Har HaBayit.

 

He begins with the famous Midrash on Jacob’s ladder: 

The angel of Babylonia climbs 70 years and descends, the angel of Persia 52 years and descends, the angel of Greece 180 years and descends, but the angel of Rome (Edom – Christianity and the Western world) keeps climbing and climbing and does not come down. Jacob is afraid and asks God: “Will he ever come down?” God promises him that yes, he will.

 

But there is another, lesser-known Midrash (Midrash Rabba Emor and Pesiqta de-Rav Kahana for Rosh Hashanah) that adds a dramatic twist:

After the four angels of the four kingdoms have gone up and down, God turns to Jacob and says: “Now it’s your turn – climb!”

Jacob looks and sees that the top of the ladder reaches the Temple Mount. He becomes afraid and refuses to climb.

God tells him: “Do not be afraid, Jacob… Had you climbed, you would have stayed on top forever and never come down again.”

Because Jacob did not climb, the Jewish people remained subjugated under the nations.

 

Rabbi Weber explains: The four classic exiles (Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome) are already behind us. What remains today is primarily the kingdom of Ishmael (the Arab/Muslim world) and the lingering influence of Edom (the United States and Western countries that for decades have pressured Israel not to exercise full sovereignty on the Temple Mount).

The reason we are still under their pressure is that “we do not ascend” – meaning the Jewish people are not yet ascending en masse to the Temple Mount to pray there.

 

He points out that Jacob instituted specifically the evening prayer (Arvit/Ma’ariv) on the Temple Mount (“And he encountered the place and spent the night there”). In other words, the Temple Mount is the source of all Jewish prayer.

Therefore God is calling to us today: “Don’t be afraid! Come up! Pray here morning, afternoon, and evening!”

 

Anyone who ascends to the Temple Mount in purity and prays there receives multiplied blessings, especially on a rainy day when every blessing and every coin in the wallet is multiplied.

 

Closing message:

Our fear of ascending to the Temple Mount today is the very same fear Jacob had in the dream.

If we overcome that fear and start ascending in great numbers, we will merit complete redemption and the rebuilding of the Third Temple speedily in our days, Amen

The following is a Grok AI summary of a recent video produced by Avi Abelow (The Pulse of Israel series):
In this passionate video, Avi Abelow (an Israeli advocate and content creator) reacts to a recent anti-Israel protest that took place outside the historic Park East Synagogue in New York City. The protest happened during an event helping American Jews make aliyah (move to Israel). Here’s the core of what he says, explained clearly and in order:

 

**1. What happened in NYC**

About 200 protesters gathered outside the synagogue chanting things like “Globalize the Intifada,” “Make them scared,” and celebrating the idea of “taking another settler out.” Abelow calls this openly violent, antisemitic incitement happening on the streets of New York.

 

**2. The big irony he points out**

The protesters were screaming at Jews in New York who were literally attending an event to leave America and move to Israel—yet the protesters were still furious. To Abelow, this proves the hatred has nothing to do with “occupation,” settlements, or politics.

 

**3. His main argument**

– These protesters (and the October 7 attackers) don’t hate Jews because of where we live—they hate the fact that Jews exist and live openly as Jews anywhere.

– They don’t want Jews in New York, London, Paris, Toronto, or Melbourne.

– They don’t want Jews in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, or Judea & Samaria (the West Bank).

– So where are Jews supposed to live? Nowhere.

That, he says, is the real agenda: not a border dispute, but the erasure of Jewish identity and self-determination.

 

**4. October 7 as proof**

He reminds viewers that Hamas didn’t attack “settlers” on October 7—they massacred left-wing, peace-seeking Israelis living right on the Gaza border, many of whom employed Gazans and believed in coexistence or even a Palestinian state. It didn’t save them. Conclusion: political concessions don’t stop the hatred, because the hatred isn’t political—it’s about Jews existing.

 

**5. The deeper message**

Abelow frames this as a spiritual war, not just a political one. He believes the only real response is for Jews to embrace their identity proudly, stand strong, and—ideally—make aliyah and come home to Israel, where Jews are sovereign and can defend themselves.

 

**6. Message to Jews worldwide**

– Stop pretending this is only about politics or Israel’s policies.

– Be proud of the miraculous Jewish story: after 2,000 years of expulsions and persecution, the Jewish people are back as a sovereign nation in their ancestral homeland.

– Especially young Jews and college students: internalize how incredible it is to be part of this moment in history.

 

**7. Message to non-Jews**

He urges non-Jewish viewers to be inspired by the Jewish return and resilience, to strengthen their own national and cultural identities, and to push back against what he calls the “red-green alliance” (far-left + Islamist movements) that he believes threatens Western societies too. He says Jews are on the front line, but everyone will eventually feel the same pressure if they don’t stand up for their own identity and countries.

 

**8. Closing call-to-action**

Come home to Israel out of love if possible, but also because hostility toward Jews is rising globally. Be proud, stand tall, and (plug) subscribe and donate to Pulse of Israel.

 

In short: Avi Abelow uses the NYC synagogue protest as a wake-up call, arguing that today’s anti-Israel activism often masks plain old antisemitism whose real goal is “Jews should not exist anywhere as a free, self-determining people.” His solution is Jewish pride, unity, and (preferably) aliyah to Israel.