According to Senator Cruz, Dr. Fauci Was: ‘THE MOST DANGEROUS BUREAUCRAT IN THE HISTORY OF THE COUNTRY’

Source:https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-slams-dr-fauci-on-hannity-the-most-dangerous-bureaucrat-in-the-history-of-the-country
11.30.2021

SEN. CRUZ SLAMS DR. FAUCI ON ‘HANNITY’: ‘THE MOST DANGEROUS BUREAUCRAT IN THE HISTORY OF THE COUNTRY’

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, this week joined Fox News’ ‘Hannity’ to discuss Dr. Anthony Fauci’s contradictory statements regarding masks and gain of function research funding at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). He also slammed the possibility of more shutdowns, COVID mandates, and school closures under President Biden’s administration. Read highlights of his interview below.

WATCH: Sen. Cruz on ‘Hannity’: Dr. Fauci is the Most Dangerous Bureaucrat in the History of the Country

On Dr. Fauci’s false statement before Congress and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) political policies, Sen. Cruz said:

“Dr. Fauci, I think, is the most dangerous bureaucrat in the history of the country. […] I don’t think anyone has hurt science, has hurt the credibility of the CDC, has hurt the credibility of doctors, more than Dr. Fauci, because throughout this pandemic, he’s been dishonest. He’s been political. He’s been partisan, and the American people know it. Why is it that the Biden administration decreed that masks have to be worn in schools by kids? Well, because teachers’ union bosses wanted it, and that’s not a scientific reason. That is a data reason. And you know, this weekend he did this long interview, where he gave the answer, he said, ‘I represent science. I am science.’”

[…]

“It is this delusion of grandeur that you cannot criticize him. It was very striking, you know, in the course of that interview, he was asked about—I asked the Attorney General Merrick Garland if he’s going to investigate and prosecute Dr. Fauci for lying to Congress, and Margaret Brennan asked him about that. And what did Fauci do? He didn’t discuss any of the substance. Instead, he just attacked and engaged in ad hominem attacks. He basically did the Beavis and Butthead defense. He just screamed ‘liars’ at everything. But you know, facts are stubborn things. So here are the simple facts that Fauci needs to explain and that the Department of Justice should investigate.

“So on May 11, Fauci testified before a Senate committee that ‘the NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Neurology.’ That’s a clear categorical statement. But then on October 20, the NIH wrote that they funded an experiment at the Wuhan lab testing ‘if spike proteins from naturally occurring back Coronavirus is circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.’ That is gain of function research. That is taking an existing virus and modifying it to make it more dangerous to humans. And listen, at the end of the day, 18 USC Section 1001 makes it a felony punishable by up to five years in prison for lying to Congress. The statements from Dr. Fauci and the NIH are directly contradictory. I’ve got to say, I think Margaret Brennan is a talented journalist, but she dropped the ball on not following up, letting him just respond with insults. Instead of asking him the simple question: You stated that we don’t fund gain a function research. The NIH stated [that] we do fund gain of function research. That can’t both be true. And if you lied to Congress, it’s a felony. She didn’t press him on that. And the reason this matters is there is a lot of circumstantial evidence to suggest that the U.S. government participated in funding research modifying coronaviruses that could well have led to COVID-19. If that’s true, that is stunning and indefensible. We know the Chinese government has enormous culpability, but there’s a real possibility the American government under Dr. Fauci does as well. That’s what he doesn’t want to address.”

On the possibility of more shutdowns under President Biden, Sen. Cruz said:

“There’s always going to be a new variant. People should get vaccinated if they want. We need no mandates, and we need to stay open. Joe Biden [and] the Democrats need to stop threatening shutdowns of schools, stop threatening shutdowns of business. Enough is enough. Take care of your own health, and we’re going to stay open. We’re not going to be in a constant state of fear from this government.”

End of Quote from Ted Cruz.

Excerpt from the article: Fauci Finally Admits Vaccines Don’t Protect Against Serious Covid or Death

In a November 12 podcast session with the New York Times, Fauci was forced to admit the fact that the vaccines do not reliably protect their recipients from serious Covid or death….

This is what data from Israel and other highly vaccinated countries has indicated for some time now. In the United Kingdom, for example, between February and September of this year, 72 percent of all Covid-related deaths were among the vaccinated. In Scotland the situation was even worse: 80 percent of Covid deaths occurred among those who had been injected with the vaccines.

For months Fauci and his fellow vaccinators censored the unfavorable data while claiming that the injections protected against serious Covid and death. The evidence to the contrary was clear and extensive. More than two months before Fauci’s admission we marshalled some of it a piece titled The Vaccines Do Not Stop Severe Covid or Death. Fauci was, of course, well familiar with the data we used, but he did everything he could to keep it concealed from the public for as long as he possibly could. Rather than coming out clean, he kept spreading misinformation about the vaccines’ alleged efficacy to protect people from falling seriously ill and dying. But in the end, even such an adroit prevaricator as Dr. Fauci could not hold out any longer under the weight of evidence….

How, then, should we describe vaccines that:

Do not protect their recipients from getting infected and infecting others, and
Do not protect their recipients against hospitalization and death?

Complete failure is the phrase that fits best here.

But these vaccines are worse than useless. They are, in fact, very likely among the most deadly and dangerous pharmaceuticals ever released upon the public.

The question is this: Why are we still injecting people with these ineffective and dangerous substances? What is the purpose other than to enrich those who are involved in their production and distribution?

Under Pressure from White House, Facebook and Twitter Censor Accurate Vaccine Information

Excerpt from “Testimony by Michael Shellenberger to The House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government”

Twitter and Facebook both censored accurate COVID information, in part to reduce vaccine hesitancy, “discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed.” This work involved the four members of the EIP, now the “Virality Project.” “Over the spring and summer of 2021, VP partnered with federal, state, and local stakeholders, as well as civil society organizations and coalitions of medical professionals to support their efforts to understand vaccine hesitancy,” explained DiResta in 2021.141
Biden administration officials scolded Twitter and Facebook executives for not doing more censorship. There were many instances of Twitter banning or labeling “misleading” accounts that were true or merely controversial.
Twitter suspended a physician for accurately describing the results of a peer reviewed study on mRNA vaccines…

Facebook, under pressure from the White House, censored “often-true content” that a company executive said in the spring of 2021 “does not contain actionable misinformation” but was “discouraging vaccines.” The State Attorney General of Missouri, who is suing the Biden Administration for violating the First Amendment, released the email.

“As you know,” wrote the Facebook executive whose name was redacted, “in addition to removing vaccine misinformation, we have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation.”
The email shows Facebook responding defensively to the White House’s then-COVID advisor, Andy Slavitt. “This often-true content,” wrote the executive, “which we allow at the post level because experts have advised us that it is important for people to be able to discuss both their personal experiences and concerns about the vaccine, but it can be framed as sensation[al], alarmist, or shocking.”

Ron Desantis says on Twitter if he is elected President, he will prosecute Fauci.

Note: vilangaon.org did not open the replies to this Twitter post and does not take any responsibility to what might be mentioned there.

DESANTIS says “YES!” he would prosecute Fauci as president. pic.twitter.com/Kf62DCgucS

— DeSantis War Room 🐊 (@DeSantisWarRoom) July 26, 2023

Comment: Recently the editor saw a video, which showed how a particular government filled a science agency with LGBT activists who then distorted the facts to “prove” a scientific result, which would be favorable towards their movement. Anthony Fauci should serve as a reminder that when government or big business or political pressure groups have vested interests in certain results, such as lockdowns, masks and forced vaccination or the “Woke Agenda”, the “follow the science” claims by the so-called science agencies should be greeted with a healthy dose of skepticism.